- Pin
- #Over 100 Companies Hold Over 830,000 BTC#
According to reports as of June 19, more than 100 companies collectively hold over 830,000 BTC, worth about $86.476 billion.
💬 Do you think Bitcoin will become a new norm for corporate asset allocation? How might this impact Bitcoin’s price? What’s your recent BTC trading strategy? Post to share your price predictions, market analysis, and strategies with us using the topic tag!
🎁 Meanwhile, Gate’s BTC Staking event is in full swing! Simply stake your BTC and earn up to 3% APY. Click the link to start staking and enjoy your earnings: https://ww - 🏁 Gate Red Bull Racing Tour 2025 In Full Swing!
Up to now, the total trading volume exceeded $2 billion, with top trader trading volume nearing $200 million
Join the race now & fuel your trades for real-world rewards:
✅ 5,000 GT Prize Pool
✅ VIP Seat at an F1 Grand Prix
✅ Futures Vouchers for New Signups
Start your engines & trade fast
Top the leaderboards. The Race is ON!
👉 Go Now: www.gate.com/competition/f1rb/s1
#GateRedBullRacingTour# - 📢 Gate releases its latest Reserve Audit Report!
💰 Total reserves: $10.453B
🟢 Excess reserves: $1.96B — ensuring full coverage and extra security for user assets.
Gate continues to uphold 100% proof-of-reserves and full transparency.
🔗 Read the full report: https://www.gate.com/zh/announcements/article/45617
User negligence led to a loss of 20,000 USDT, and the configuration error in the Uniswap V3 liquidity pool has attracted attention.
According to the Gate News bot, data from Etherscan shows that user 0x7e…3207 completed a transaction of SPK and USDT through the Uniswap V3 platform at 16:00 UTC+8, exchanging 1 SPK for 19,686.87 USDT.
According to the analysis report by researcher @web3_mario, user teochew.eth previously created a liquidity pool with a 1% transaction fee on Uniswap and injected 20,000 USD into it as unilateral liquidity. Due to the set price being too high, a single transaction resulted in the majority of the USDT in the pool being swapped.
teochew.eth subsequently sent a message to 0x7e…3207 via on-chain transaction, acknowledging the oversight of misreading the pool direction and requesting the other party to return part of the funds.
Original Link